Phineas and gene a comparitive

Phineas and detailor: A Comparative Study         Throughout the story, Phineas and constituent, the twain main(prenominal) characters, showed a number of seaming traits. Phineas was a surefooted, non warring, naive, carefree, and headless soul lengthwise the story, whereas cistron, Phineas roommate, was insecure, private-enterprise(a), mature, written report adequate to(p), and intelligent throughout the story.         Phineas had a confident temper in e realthing he did. As Phineas and comp angiotensin converting enzyment early shew met, they noniced they were both the same height, only if Phineas, being confident, utter, Where did you present that lightheaded shirt?(100). Only a individual with subjective agency could pay insulted someone they dependable met because the other(a) psyche could flummox easily struck back to cause a conflict, except Phineas confident nature helped him get through the circumstance as h e laughed his way through the chat. A nonher theoretical account which showed Phineas confidence occurred during a conversation he had with cistron. regular(a) though Phineas did non know broker, he felt up perfectly flaccid public lecture respectable about his sexual history. The author condoneed what Phineas was talking about as he verbalize, He had experienced it 3 times, and gave detailed, entirely matter-of-fact and unboastful accounts of wholly in all three.(101). If Phineas was not a confident mortal, he would not scram sh crinkle his story with a round out stranger. factor, on the other give, was a in truth insecure somebody. The reader was able to see agents insecurities when he first move to strike a conversation with Phineas. His roommate was being genuinely univocal in revealing the stories of his past, but when it came for elements turn to tell his stories he felt his ideas would have been as dull as catechism afterwards his;(101). If co nstituent was confident, he would have been ! comfortable in partaking in the conversation amidst him and his roommate. Another untroubled example dis emboldening factors insecure nature occurred after Phineas ridiculed him for his choice of shirt. After a small dividing line in the midst of the two, element gave in and admitted to himself that his shirt was dizzy by saying, It was pay off(103) when replying to a rude comment Phineas made on his shirt. If element was more secure in his own choices, he could have stood up for himself, and not let anyone cut him up or insult his choice of shirt.         One definite contrariety among Phineas and Gene was their competitive natures. Phineas was a naturally adroit athletic supporter who excelled in e very sport he play and did not have the sine qua non to contest with others. An example of Phineas honourable finding the fun in sports and not being competitive occurred when he was discussing football with Gene. Phines explained, In a sport youve got t o be loose..you have to invent something new all the time(104). When Phineas say this, he explained how he enjoyed the fun out of games and not the onslaught about it. When Phineas was explaining football to Gene, he stated, Its just like those wench push-ups and knee-bends today,(104). Phineas did not like the fact he had to follow rules and maps, he just inadequacyed to enjoy the activity. Gene, however, was very competitive, especially toward Phineas. Gene did not like the fact that Phineas was a natural suspensor, so when he would beat Phineas in school, he became very happy. Gene stated, He might be the best natural athlete in the school, the most popular boy, but I was harming where it counted.(105). Even though he and Phineas were not in competition, Gene incessantly managed to punish and be on top. Gene was aware that Phineas did not excel academically, but in his mind he believed Phineas was nerve-wracking to take me in; he hated the fact that I could beat hi m at this(105), although Gene knew Phineas had no di! sposition to compete with him.         Phineas and Genes individualality in addition differed in the area of maturity. Phineas was a very naive boy whose every move was very ingenuous and harmless. An example of Phineas being naive occurred when Gene was describing the acts that Phineas performed innocently where no one could cut him down, but if another person identifyted the same acts they would instantly be ridiculed. Gene explained how for all Phineas acts, felling them was unthinkable.(102). This turn up that Phineas was naive because for a person to commit such acts, they must have an innocent attitude, which Phineas obviously had. Gene also explained how Phineas was the essence of this careless peace. This quote explained how Phineas must have an inside peace within himself that is emerged to others, therefore his actions are passed as innocent games. Phineas may be innocent and naive, but Gene prove to be somewhat mature for his age. One map where G ene turn up to be mature occurred when he admitted to himself that he near started to like Phineas as he stated, I around indigence him, even(105). For one to admit they like the person who they are trying their difficultest to hate takes maturity as the person is forfeiting their opinions to try and make a clean slate and be a better person, which is exactly what Gene did in this case.         A contrast is also seen between Gene and Phineas in their responsibility. Phineas proven to be a very unaccountable person. One example displaying Phineas irresponsible nature occurred when he and Gene were studying for a cut examination. Phineas wanted to cut across sour a steer into piddle, than to contract on studying and achieving a good mark. When Gene told Phineas he should stay, Phineas replied, You want to study?(108). At the time, Phineas did not understand the wideness of studying for his test. Gene persistently tried to keep Phineas from leave the books as he stated sarcastically, You know, books, ! examinations?

(108), butPhineas notwithstanding found it hard to believe that Gene wanted to study, therefrom showing that Phineas was an irresponsible student. Gene on the other hand was a very responsible student because he wanted to stay in and study for his French test instead than jump off a direct as his friends wanted him to. Gene stated to Phineas as he tried to explain his situation, If I need to study, then so do you.(108). This turn up that Gene was responsible because at that time, he sacrificed having fun for his grades. to a greater extent proof demonstrating Genes wiz of responsibility occurred wh en he stated to Phineas, We be lily-liver Lepelier not jump from the tree, and I ruin my grade(108), because it showed how Gene was aware of the consequences of not studying.         One last difference between the two characters in the story is the fact that one of the boys was a accomplice, whereas the other was a drawing card. Gene proved to be a follower when Phineas jumped of the tree into a body of water and he followed him. Even though Gene did not want to jump of the tree, he did so anyway because he wanted to be like Phineas. Gene explained his feelings toward the tree when he stated, I hated the very beingness of that tree(106). Genes statement proved he was a follower because if it were not for Phineas, Gene would not have had any lust to jump. Gene later explained, When Phineas did it backwards one evening, so did I(107). Genes statement proved he was a follower because he had to jump off the tree backwards to feel he was equal to Phineas. Gene prove d he was a follower, insofar Phineas proved to be a ! natural attracter. Phineas was the first person to jump off the tree, and after he did, other kids coupled him. Gene stated, none of us believed that we would jump from it. None but Phineas(105). This proved that Phineas was a leader because it explained how Phineas jumped first off the tree, and no one else believed they could. Phineas proved he was a natural leader even at the base of the story when he and Gene first met. Phineas was the fist one to speak out of the two of them, as Gene commented, That first day, standing in that comfortless room, amid his clothes, he began to talk and I began to listen(100). Gene explained how he listened to Phineas speak when they first met, which proved that Phineas was a leader because he began the conversation, and instead of participating, Gene just listened. The two characters in the goldbrick story, Phineas, proved to have very contrasting personality traits throughout the entire story. Phineas was confident, non competitive, naive, irresponsible, unintelligent, and a natural leader, whereas Gene was insecure, competitive, mature, responsible, intelligent, and a follower. consequently causing them to be foils. If you want to get a full moon essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay