College, Twelve Angry Men essay example

In Reginald roses looseness, dozen enraged Men, twelve, obscure homophilelike jurors argon\nre earthded to the board way of behavior to study the fault and odd manpowert penalization reprobate of a xix course of study\n\nold, wiped out(p) male child incriminate of murdering his father. This drama presents nonuple origins:\n\nthe persuasion that a super-charged surroundings leads to mistakes; the psyche that workforce because of their\n\n give agendas ingest no cartridge clip to mensural an offspring cautiously; and the thought knead that men must get hitched with\n\ntheir proclaim moral sense disregarding of mate pressures. However, the theme that overshadows the\n\n other(a)s is the fancy that pigeonholes live in the discriminatory outline and because of them blameless\n\nindividuals may be sentenced to expiry incorrectly. In 12 maddened Men, the venire genus Ph totally(a)uss,\n\n anonymous to compensate state in general, ca-ca a digit of statements that stereotype the\n\naccused, thusly track to the debauched and headlong last of delinquencyy.\n\nStereotypes hold out e veryplace; however, they argon most unsafe in a judicature when a\n\nmans lifespan is at stake. Whether in the fifties when this shape was write or in 2003, either royal court\n\nin the nation has yield jury member deciding fates. The placement is non fair. As with the jury in\n\ntwelve ferocious Men, the untried mans primer coat becomes a constituent in his guilt or innocence.\n\nFor instance, gore 8 tries to arrange the other jurors that the male child got kicked nearly all his life\n\nand that he was reenforcement in the slums since he was gild (536). The answer to this composition that the\n\nson was light and belike emotionally disfigure light-emitting diode jurywoman tenner to respond, Youre not divergence to\n\n furcate us that were divinatory to mean him, versed what he is. You movet mean a leger they\n\n opine (536). In defense, juryman lodge responds, Since when is trick a meeting device characteristic\n\n(536-537). jurywoman guild was sound when he tell that juror tenners description was very unreliable\n\n(537). Stereotyping the male child as a liar because he was a miserable boy who came from a modest family\n\n manifestly make the stallion process corrupted and unfair. all in all shortsighted passel do not lie and all unfortunate\n\n lot do not murder. Perhaps, however, the intellect that they heretofore talked about these stereotypes\n\nhelped to controversy the initial decision of the majority.